Methodology and adherence to scientific ethics are the two most important points for any work. These are the two points that make a work successful or weak. This article, in this framework, is a review of the Kurdish Working Group's Writing Guide published by the Mesopotamia Foundation in December 2019. It is understood from the book that this Guide is the result of several years of the Kurmanci Working Group’s work and was prepared with the participation of 20 academics / academically affiliated people. Although it has been prepared for several years, it can be seen that the work and the prepared Guide have serious problems in terms of scientific methods and ethics. Therefore, methodological problems and scientific ethics of the Guide and its preparation process have been evaluated in this article.
Methodology and adherence to scientific ethics are the two most important points for any work. These are the two points that make a work successful or weak.
This article, in this framework, is a review of the Kurdish Working Group's Writing Guide published by the Mesopotamia Foundation in December 2019. It is understood from the book that this Guide is the result of several years of the Kurmanci Working Group’s work and was prepared with the participation of 20 academics / academically affiliated people. Although it has been prepared for several years, it can be seen that the work and the prepared Guide have serious problems in terms of scientific methods and ethics. Therefore, methodological problems and scientific ethics of the Guide and its preparation process have been evaluated in this article.
Methodology and adherence to scientific ethics are the two most important points for any work. These are the two points that make a work successful or weak.
This article, in this framework, is a review of the Kurdish Working Group's Writing Guide published by the Mesopotamia Foundation in December 2019. It is understood from the book that this Guide is the result of several years of the Kurmanci Working Group’s work and was prepared with the participation of 20 academics / academically affiliated people. Although it has been prepared for several years, it can be seen that the work and the prepared Guide have serious problems in terms of scientific methods and ethics. Therefore, methodological problems and scientific ethics of the Guide and its preparation process have been evaluated in this article.
Kürtçe, Yazım Klavuzu, Kürtçe Çalışma Grubu, Metodoloji, Bilimsel Etik, Kurdish, Spelling Guide, Kurdish Working Group, Methodology, Scientific Ethics
Primary Language | Kurdi |
---|---|
Journal Section | Makaleler |
Authors | |
Publication Date | January 25, 2023 |
Submission Date | January 14, 2023 |
Acceptance Date | January 23, 2023 |
Published in Issue | Year 2023Volume: 9 Issue: 1 |
Bibtex | @book review { ijoks1234239, journal = {International Journal of Kurdish Studies}, issn = {2149-2751}, eissn = {2149-2751}, address = {}, publisher = {Hasan KARACAN}, year = {2023}, volume = {9}, number = {1}, pages = {55 - 70}, doi = {10.21600/ijoks.1234239}, title = {A Critique of the Kurdish Working Group’s Writing Guide in Terms of Methodology and Scientific Ethics}, key = {cite}, author = {Keskin, Necat} } |
APA | Keskin, N. (2023). A Critique of the Kurdish Working Group’s Writing Guide in Terms of Methodology and Scientific Ethics . International Journal of Kurdish Studies , 9 (1) , 55-70 . DOI: 10.21600/ijoks.1234239 |
MLA | Keskin, N. "A Critique of the Kurdish Working Group’s Writing Guide in Terms of Methodology and Scientific Ethics" . International Journal of Kurdish Studies 9 (2023 ): 55-70 <http://www.ijoks.com/en/pub/issue/75554/1234239> |
Chicago | Keskin, N. "A Critique of the Kurdish Working Group’s Writing Guide in Terms of Methodology and Scientific Ethics". International Journal of Kurdish Studies 9 (2023 ): 55-70 |
RIS | TY - JOUR T1 - A Critique of the Kurdish Working Group’s Writing Guide in Terms of Methodology and Scientific Ethics AU - NecatKeskin Y1 - 2023 PY - 2023 N1 - doi: 10.21600/ijoks.1234239 DO - 10.21600/ijoks.1234239 T2 - International Journal of Kurdish Studies JF - Journal JO - JOR SP - 55 EP - 70 VL - 9 IS - 1 SN - 2149-2751-2149-2751 M3 - doi: 10.21600/ijoks.1234239 UR - https://doi.org/10.21600/ijoks.1234239 Y2 - 2023 ER - |
EndNote | %0 International Journal of Kurdish Studies A Critique of the Kurdish Working Group’s Writing Guide in Terms of Methodology and Scientific Ethics %A Necat Keskin %T A Critique of the Kurdish Working Group’s Writing Guide in Terms of Methodology and Scientific Ethics %D 2023 %J International Journal of Kurdish Studies %P 2149-2751-2149-2751 %V 9 %N 1 %R doi: 10.21600/ijoks.1234239 %U 10.21600/ijoks.1234239 |
ISNAD | Keskin, Necat . "A Critique of the Kurdish Working Group’s Writing Guide in Terms of Methodology and Scientific Ethics". International Journal of Kurdish Studies 9 / 1 (January 2023): 55-70 . https://doi.org/10.21600/ijoks.1234239 |
AMA | Keskin N. A Critique of the Kurdish Working Group’s Writing Guide in Terms of Methodology and Scientific Ethics. Kurdish Studies. 2023; 9(1): 55-70. |
Vancouver | Keskin N. A Critique of the Kurdish Working Group’s Writing Guide in Terms of Methodology and Scientific Ethics. International Journal of Kurdish Studies. 2023; 9(1): 55-70. |
IEEE | N. Keskin , "A Critique of the Kurdish Working Group’s Writing Guide in Terms of Methodology and Scientific Ethics", International Journal of Kurdish Studies, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 55-70, Jan. 2023, doi:10.21600/ijoks.1234239 |
NOTICE: All submissions will be accepted through the Manuscript Submission System. Please click on http://ijoks.com/ and register to submit a paper.