Araştırma Makalesi
BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

Investigation of Life Satisfaction Levels in Adults in Terms of Some Variables: North Cyprus Example

Yıl 2024, Cilt: 6 Sayı: 1, 1 - 15, 31.03.2024

Bedriye Yılmaz Alıcı Mehmet Kılıç Gizem Sebahat Çoban

https://doi.org/10.38151/akef.2024.126

Öz

This study aims to examine the life satisfaction levels of adults in terms of some variables and metaphorical perceptions. This study was carried out with the parallel method converging from mixed research designs. The quantitative data were collected on 191 volunteers, while the qualitative data were collected on 83 volunteers (providing feedback for qualitative data) with simple random sampling method. Content analysis was carried out in qualitative data. The quantitative results showed that the participants' life satisfaction levels were moderate. The participants produced 62 metaphors for life satisfaction in qualitative part. The most used metaphor for life satisfaction was the expression "happiness". Other findings of the study are presented in the discussion section within the scope of the relevant literature.

Anahtar Kelimeler

life satisfaction metaphor adulthood mixed research design

Etik Beyan

Cyprus Science University Ethics Committee, Date 06.04.2022, Number: 2022/04.009.

Destekleyen Kurum

yok

Proje Numarası

yok

Teşekkür

-

Kaynakça

  • Akçay, S. (2016). Öğretmen adaylarının biyoteknoloji algısının metaforlar yoluyla analizi [The analysis of prospective teachers’ biotechnology perception through metaphors]. Inonu University Journal of the Faculty of Education, 17(3), 139-151.
  • Al-Attiyah, A., And Nasser, R. (2013). Gender and age differences in life satisfaction within a sex-segregated society: Sampling youth in Qatar. International Journal of Adolescence and Youth, 21(1), 84-95. https://doi.org/10.1080/02673843.2013.808158.
  • Alıcı, B. & Seçim, G. (2020). The psychometric properties of the Turkish version of the Riverside life satisfaction scale-adult form. Sage Open, 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244020979823.
  • Alkan, V., Şimşek, S. & Erbil, B. A. (2019). Karma yöntem: Öyküleyici alanyazın incelemesi [Mixed Methods design: a narrative literature review]. Journal of Qualitative Research in Education, 7(2), 559-582. https://doi.org/10.14689/issn.2148-2624.1.7c.2s.5m
  • Altunışık, R., Coşkun, R., Bayraktaroğlu, S., & Yıldırım, E. (2005). Sosyal bilimlerde araştırma yöntemleri Spss uygulamalı [Research methods in social sciences: SPSS applied]. Sakarya Publishing.
  • Amati, V., Meggiolaro, S., Rivellini, G. & Zaccarin, S. (2018). Social relations and life satisfaction: the role of friends. Genus, 74(7), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41118-018-0032-z.
  • Andrews, F. M. & Withey, S. B. (1976). Social indicators of well-being: American's perceptions of life quality. Plenum Press.
  • Bryman, A. & Cramer, D. (2001). Quantitative data analysis with SPSS release 10 for windows: A guide for social scientists. Routledge
  • Campbell, A., P. E. Converse & W. L. Rodgers (1976). The quality of American life: Perceptions, evaluations, and satisfactions. Russel Sage Foundation.
  • Chang, E. C., Yang, H., and Yu, T. (2017). Perceived interpersonal sources of life satisfaction in Chinese and American students: Cultural or gender differences? The Journal of Positive Psychology, 12(4), 414-424. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2016.1198925.
  • Creswell, J. W. (2015). Revisiting mixed methods and advancing scientific practices. In Hesse-Biber, S., Johnson, R. B. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of multimethod and mixed methods research inquiry (pp. 57-71). Oxford University Press.
  • Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2017). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Sage publications.
  • Dağlı, A. & Baysal, N. (2016). Yaşam doyumu ölçeğinin Türkçe’ye uyarlanması: Geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması [Adaptation of the satisfaction with life scale into Turkish: The study of validıty and reliability]. Electronic Journal of Social Sciences, 15(59). https://doi.org/10.17755/esosder.263229.
  • Dağlı, A. & Baysal, N. (2017). Investigating teachers' life satisfaction. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 5(7), 1250-1256.
  • Diener, E. (1984). Subjective well-being. Psychological Bulletin, 95(3), 542-575.
  • Diener, E., Emmons, R. A., Larsen, R. J. & Griffin, S. (1985). The satisfaction with life scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 49(1), 71-75.
  • Diener, E., & Oishi, S. (2000). Money and happiness: Income and subjective well-being across nations. In E. Diener & E. M. Suh (Eds.), Culture and subjective well-being (pp. 185-218). The MIT Press.
  • Erdinç, İ. (2018). Evli çiftlerde, evlilik uyumu, cinsel yaşam doyumu ve yaşam doyumu arasındaki ilişkinin incelenmesi [Examining the relationship between marital adjustment, sexual life satisfaction and life satisfaction in married couples][Master’s thesis, Gelişim University]. https://tez.yok.gov.tr/UlusalTezMerkezi/.
  • Estes, R. (1984). The social progress of nations. Praeger.
  • Giusta, M. D., Jewell, S. L., and Kambhampati, U. S. (2011). Gender and life satisfaction in the UK. Feminist Economics, 17(3), 1-34. https://doi.org/10.1080/13545701.2011.582028.
  • Glatzer, W., Zapf, W., & Berger, R. (1984). Lebensqualität in der Bundesrepublik: Objektive Lebensbedingungen und subjektives Wohlbefinden. Campus-Verlag.
  • Gorusch, R. L. (1983). Factor analysis. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Hatipoğlu, E. & Tuncay, T. (2021). İşsizlerde yaşam doyumunu etkileyen faktörlerin incelenmesi: Dünya değerler araştırması verisinden Türkiye analizi [Investigation of the factors affecting life satisfaction of the unemployed: a turkey analysis from the world values survey data]. Journal of Society & Social Work, 32(2), 567-587.
  • Joshanloo, M., & Jovanović, V. (2020). The relationship between gender and life satisfaction: analysis across demographic groups and global regions. Archives of women's mental health, 23(3), 331-338.
  • Kaplan, İ. ve Erdem, A. (2022). Yaşam doyumu ile romantik ilişki doyumu arasındaki ilişkinin incelenmesi: Bir z kuşağı çalışması [Examining the relationship between life satisfaction and romantic relationship satisfaction: a generation z study]. Journal of Social Research and Behavioral Sciences, 8(15), 77-96. https://doi.org/10.52096/jsrbs.8.15.6
  • Karasar, N. (2011). Bilimsel araştirma yöntemi: Kavramlar, ilkeler, teknikler [Scientific research method: Concepts, principles, techniques]. Anı.
  • Khodabakhsh, S. (2022). Factors affecting life satisfaction of older adults in Asia: A systematic Review. Journal of Happiness Studies, 23, 1289-1304. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-021-00433-x.
  • Kılıç, M. Y. (2022). Öğretmen adaylarının Türk eğitim politikalarına yönelik algılarının metafor aracılığıyla incelenmesi [Examination of pre-service teachers' perceptions of Turkish educatıonal policies through metaphor]. The Journal of Academic Social Science, 10 (125), 120-135.
  • Kirişoğlu, Ş. (2016). Genç yetişkinlerin aile yapıları ile benlik saygısı ve yaşam doyumu arasındaki ilişkinin incelenmesi [Investigation of the relationship between family structure and self-esteem and life satisfaction of young adults][Master’s thesis, Haliç University]. https://tez.yok.gov.tr/UlusalTezMerkezi/.
  • Kline, R. B. (2016). Principle and practice of structural equation modelling (4. ed.). The Guilford Press.
  • Kushlev, K., Radosic, N., & Diener, E. (2022). Subjective Well-being and prosociality around the globe: Happy people give more of their time and money to others. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 13(4), 849-861. https://doi.org/10.1177/19485506211043379
  • Landau, M. J., & Meier, B. P. (2011). The role of concrete learning in metaphorical reasoning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 37(3), 965-971.
  • Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. University of Chicago Press.
  • Luhmann, M., Hofmann, W., Eid, M., & Lucas, R. E. (2012). Subjective well-being and adaptation to life events: A meta-analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102(3), 592–615. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0025948
  • Margolis, S., Schwitzgebel, E., Ozer, D. J., & Lyubomirsky, S. (2019). A new measure of life satisfaction: The Riverside Life Satisfaction Scale. Journal of personality assessment, 101(6), 621-630.
  • Mellor, D., Stokes, M., Firth, L., Hayashi, Y., & Cummins, R. (2008). Need for belonging, relationship satisfaction, loneliness, and life satisfaction. Personality and individual differences, 45(3), 213-218. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2008.03.020
  • Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: an expanded sourcebook. SAGE.
  • Mroczek, D. K., & Spiro, A. (2005). Change in life satisfaction during adulthood: Findings from the Veterans Affairs Normative Aging Study. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88(1), 189-202.
  • Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric theory. McGraw Hill.
  • Pavot, W., & Diener, E. (2008). The Satisfaction with Life Scale and the emerging construct of life satisfaction. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 3(2), 137-152.
  • Prasoon, R., & Chaturvedi, K. R. (2016). Life satisfaction: a literature review. The Researcher: International Journal of Management, Humanities and Social Sciences, 1(2), 24-31.
  • Proulx, C. M., Helms, H. M., & Buehler, C. (2007). Marital quality and personal well-being: A meta-analysis. Journal of Marriage and Family, 69(3), 576-593.
  • Ruggeri, K., Garcia-Garzon, E., Maguire, Á., Matz, S., & Huppert, F. A. (2020). Well-being is more than happiness and life satisfaction: a multidimensional analysis of 21 countries. Health and quality of life outcomes, 18(192), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12955-020-01423-y
  • Saban, A., Koçbeker, B. N., & Saban, A. (2006). Öğretmen adaylarının öğretmen kavramına ilişkin algılarının metafor analizi yoluyla incelenmesi [Examining prospective teachers' perceptions of the concept of teacher through metaphor analysis]. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 6(2), 461–522.
  • Saban, A. (2008). Okula ilişkin metaforlar [Metaphors related to school]. Educational Administration: Theory & Practice, 55(55), 459-496.
  • Sarason, B. R., Sarason, I. G., Shearin, E. N., & Pierce, G. R. (1987). A brief measure of social support: Practical and theoretical implications. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 4(4), 497-510.
  • Scheier, M. F., Matthews, K. A., Owens, J. F., Magovern, G. J., & Lefebvre, R. C. (1989). Dispositional optimism and recovery from coronary artery bypass surgery: The beneficial effects on physical and psychological well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57(6), 1024-1040.
  • Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2013). Using multivariate statistics (6th ed.). Allyn and Bacon.
  • Uludağ, G., & Çınar, Ö. (2021). Özel işletmelerde algılanan sosyal destek ile yaşam doyumu ve işgören performansı ilişkisi [The relationship between perceived social support and life satisfaction and employee performance in private enterprises]. International Journal of Academic Accumulatioın, 4(1), 84-97.
  • Ünal, S., Karlıdağ, R., & Yoloğlu, S. (2001). Hekimlerde tükenmişlik ve iş doyumu düzeylerinin yaşam doyumu düzeyleri ile ilişkisi [The relationship between burnout and job satisfaction levels and life satisfaction levels in physicians]. The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, 4(2), 113-118.
  • Umberson, D., Pudrovska, T., & Reczek, C. (2010). Parenthood, childlessness, and well-being: A life course perspective. Journal of Marriage and Family, 72(3), 612-629.
  • Yaremtchuk, S. V. (2014). Age, gender and life satisfaction in early adulthood in the far east of Russia. Life Science Journal, 11(11), 161-165.
  • Yıldırım, A., & Şimşek, H. (2018). Sosyal bilimlerde nitel araştırma yöntemleri [Qualitative research methods in the social sciences]. Seçkin Publishing.

YETİŞKİNLERDE YAŞAM DOYUM DÜZEYLERİNİN BAZI DEĞİŞKENLER VE METAFORİK ALGILAR AÇISINDAN İNCELENMESİ: KUZEY KIBRIS ÖRNEĞİ

Yıl 2024, Cilt: 6 Sayı: 1, 1 - 15, 31.03.2024

Bedriye Yılmaz Alıcı Mehmet Kılıç Gizem Sebahat Çoban

https://doi.org/10.38151/akef.2024.126

Öz

Bu çalışma yetişkinlerin yaşam doyumunu bazı değişkenler açısından ve metaforik algılar açısından incelemiştir. Bu çalışma karma araştırma desenlerinden yakınsayan paralel yöntem ile yürütülmüştür. Çalışmanın nicel verileri 191 gönüllü kişi üzerinde toplanmış, nitel veriler ise 83 gönüllü kişi üzerinde toplanmıştır. Nitel veriler üzerinde içerik analizi gerçekleştirilmiştir. nicel araştırma sonuçlarına göre katılımcıların yaşam doyumu düzeyleri orta düzeydedir. Çalışmanın nitel bölümünde yaşam doyumu ile ilgili olarsak katılımcılar 62 metofor ortsaya çıkarmışlardır. Bu metaforların çoğunluğunun mutluluk ile ilgili olduğu tespit edilmiştir. Çalışmanın diğer bulguları ilgili literatür ışığında tartışılmıştır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

yaşam doyumu metafor yetişkinlik dönemi karma araştırma deseni

Etik Beyan

Cyprus Science University Ethics Committee, Date 06.04.2022, Number: 2022/04.009.

Proje Numarası

yok

Kaynakça

  • Akçay, S. (2016). Öğretmen adaylarının biyoteknoloji algısının metaforlar yoluyla analizi [The analysis of prospective teachers’ biotechnology perception through metaphors]. Inonu University Journal of the Faculty of Education, 17(3), 139-151.
  • Al-Attiyah, A., And Nasser, R. (2013). Gender and age differences in life satisfaction within a sex-segregated society: Sampling youth in Qatar. International Journal of Adolescence and Youth, 21(1), 84-95. https://doi.org/10.1080/02673843.2013.808158.
  • Alıcı, B. & Seçim, G. (2020). The psychometric properties of the Turkish version of the Riverside life satisfaction scale-adult form. Sage Open, 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244020979823.
  • Alkan, V., Şimşek, S. & Erbil, B. A. (2019). Karma yöntem: Öyküleyici alanyazın incelemesi [Mixed Methods design: a narrative literature review]. Journal of Qualitative Research in Education, 7(2), 559-582. https://doi.org/10.14689/issn.2148-2624.1.7c.2s.5m
  • Altunışık, R., Coşkun, R., Bayraktaroğlu, S., & Yıldırım, E. (2005). Sosyal bilimlerde araştırma yöntemleri Spss uygulamalı [Research methods in social sciences: SPSS applied]. Sakarya Publishing.
  • Amati, V., Meggiolaro, S., Rivellini, G. & Zaccarin, S. (2018). Social relations and life satisfaction: the role of friends. Genus, 74(7), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41118-018-0032-z.
  • Andrews, F. M. & Withey, S. B. (1976). Social indicators of well-being: American's perceptions of life quality. Plenum Press.
  • Bryman, A. & Cramer, D. (2001). Quantitative data analysis with SPSS release 10 for windows: A guide for social scientists. Routledge
  • Campbell, A., P. E. Converse & W. L. Rodgers (1976). The quality of American life: Perceptions, evaluations, and satisfactions. Russel Sage Foundation.
  • Chang, E. C., Yang, H., and Yu, T. (2017). Perceived interpersonal sources of life satisfaction in Chinese and American students: Cultural or gender differences? The Journal of Positive Psychology, 12(4), 414-424. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2016.1198925.
  • Creswell, J. W. (2015). Revisiting mixed methods and advancing scientific practices. In Hesse-Biber, S., Johnson, R. B. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of multimethod and mixed methods research inquiry (pp. 57-71). Oxford University Press.
  • Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2017). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Sage publications.
  • Dağlı, A. & Baysal, N. (2016). Yaşam doyumu ölçeğinin Türkçe’ye uyarlanması: Geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması [Adaptation of the satisfaction with life scale into Turkish: The study of validıty and reliability]. Electronic Journal of Social Sciences, 15(59). https://doi.org/10.17755/esosder.263229.
  • Dağlı, A. & Baysal, N. (2017). Investigating teachers' life satisfaction. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 5(7), 1250-1256.
  • Diener, E. (1984). Subjective well-being. Psychological Bulletin, 95(3), 542-575.
  • Diener, E., Emmons, R. A., Larsen, R. J. & Griffin, S. (1985). The satisfaction with life scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 49(1), 71-75.
  • Diener, E., & Oishi, S. (2000). Money and happiness: Income and subjective well-being across nations. In E. Diener & E. M. Suh (Eds.), Culture and subjective well-being (pp. 185-218). The MIT Press.
  • Erdinç, İ. (2018). Evli çiftlerde, evlilik uyumu, cinsel yaşam doyumu ve yaşam doyumu arasındaki ilişkinin incelenmesi [Examining the relationship between marital adjustment, sexual life satisfaction and life satisfaction in married couples][Master’s thesis, Gelişim University]. https://tez.yok.gov.tr/UlusalTezMerkezi/.
  • Estes, R. (1984). The social progress of nations. Praeger.
  • Giusta, M. D., Jewell, S. L., and Kambhampati, U. S. (2011). Gender and life satisfaction in the UK. Feminist Economics, 17(3), 1-34. https://doi.org/10.1080/13545701.2011.582028.
  • Glatzer, W., Zapf, W., & Berger, R. (1984). Lebensqualität in der Bundesrepublik: Objektive Lebensbedingungen und subjektives Wohlbefinden. Campus-Verlag.
  • Gorusch, R. L. (1983). Factor analysis. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Hatipoğlu, E. & Tuncay, T. (2021). İşsizlerde yaşam doyumunu etkileyen faktörlerin incelenmesi: Dünya değerler araştırması verisinden Türkiye analizi [Investigation of the factors affecting life satisfaction of the unemployed: a turkey analysis from the world values survey data]. Journal of Society & Social Work, 32(2), 567-587.
  • Joshanloo, M., & Jovanović, V. (2020). The relationship between gender and life satisfaction: analysis across demographic groups and global regions. Archives of women's mental health, 23(3), 331-338.
  • Kaplan, İ. ve Erdem, A. (2022). Yaşam doyumu ile romantik ilişki doyumu arasındaki ilişkinin incelenmesi: Bir z kuşağı çalışması [Examining the relationship between life satisfaction and romantic relationship satisfaction: a generation z study]. Journal of Social Research and Behavioral Sciences, 8(15), 77-96. https://doi.org/10.52096/jsrbs.8.15.6
  • Karasar, N. (2011). Bilimsel araştirma yöntemi: Kavramlar, ilkeler, teknikler [Scientific research method: Concepts, principles, techniques]. Anı.
  • Khodabakhsh, S. (2022). Factors affecting life satisfaction of older adults in Asia: A systematic Review. Journal of Happiness Studies, 23, 1289-1304. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-021-00433-x.
  • Kılıç, M. Y. (2022). Öğretmen adaylarının Türk eğitim politikalarına yönelik algılarının metafor aracılığıyla incelenmesi [Examination of pre-service teachers' perceptions of Turkish educatıonal policies through metaphor]. The Journal of Academic Social Science, 10 (125), 120-135.
  • Kirişoğlu, Ş. (2016). Genç yetişkinlerin aile yapıları ile benlik saygısı ve yaşam doyumu arasındaki ilişkinin incelenmesi [Investigation of the relationship between family structure and self-esteem and life satisfaction of young adults][Master’s thesis, Haliç University]. https://tez.yok.gov.tr/UlusalTezMerkezi/.
  • Kline, R. B. (2016). Principle and practice of structural equation modelling (4. ed.). The Guilford Press.
  • Kushlev, K., Radosic, N., & Diener, E. (2022). Subjective Well-being and prosociality around the globe: Happy people give more of their time and money to others. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 13(4), 849-861. https://doi.org/10.1177/19485506211043379
  • Landau, M. J., & Meier, B. P. (2011). The role of concrete learning in metaphorical reasoning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 37(3), 965-971.
  • Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. University of Chicago Press.
  • Luhmann, M., Hofmann, W., Eid, M., & Lucas, R. E. (2012). Subjective well-being and adaptation to life events: A meta-analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102(3), 592–615. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0025948
  • Margolis, S., Schwitzgebel, E., Ozer, D. J., & Lyubomirsky, S. (2019). A new measure of life satisfaction: The Riverside Life Satisfaction Scale. Journal of personality assessment, 101(6), 621-630.
  • Mellor, D., Stokes, M., Firth, L., Hayashi, Y., & Cummins, R. (2008). Need for belonging, relationship satisfaction, loneliness, and life satisfaction. Personality and individual differences, 45(3), 213-218. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2008.03.020
  • Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: an expanded sourcebook. SAGE.
  • Mroczek, D. K., & Spiro, A. (2005). Change in life satisfaction during adulthood: Findings from the Veterans Affairs Normative Aging Study. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88(1), 189-202.
  • Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric theory. McGraw Hill.
  • Pavot, W., & Diener, E. (2008). The Satisfaction with Life Scale and the emerging construct of life satisfaction. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 3(2), 137-152.
  • Prasoon, R., & Chaturvedi, K. R. (2016). Life satisfaction: a literature review. The Researcher: International Journal of Management, Humanities and Social Sciences, 1(2), 24-31.
  • Proulx, C. M., Helms, H. M., & Buehler, C. (2007). Marital quality and personal well-being: A meta-analysis. Journal of Marriage and Family, 69(3), 576-593.
  • Ruggeri, K., Garcia-Garzon, E., Maguire, Á., Matz, S., & Huppert, F. A. (2020). Well-being is more than happiness and life satisfaction: a multidimensional analysis of 21 countries. Health and quality of life outcomes, 18(192), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12955-020-01423-y
  • Saban, A., Koçbeker, B. N., & Saban, A. (2006). Öğretmen adaylarının öğretmen kavramına ilişkin algılarının metafor analizi yoluyla incelenmesi [Examining prospective teachers' perceptions of the concept of teacher through metaphor analysis]. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 6(2), 461–522.
  • Saban, A. (2008). Okula ilişkin metaforlar [Metaphors related to school]. Educational Administration: Theory & Practice, 55(55), 459-496.
  • Sarason, B. R., Sarason, I. G., Shearin, E. N., & Pierce, G. R. (1987). A brief measure of social support: Practical and theoretical implications. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 4(4), 497-510.
  • Scheier, M. F., Matthews, K. A., Owens, J. F., Magovern, G. J., & Lefebvre, R. C. (1989). Dispositional optimism and recovery from coronary artery bypass surgery: The beneficial effects on physical and psychological well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57(6), 1024-1040.
  • Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2013). Using multivariate statistics (6th ed.). Allyn and Bacon.
  • Uludağ, G., & Çınar, Ö. (2021). Özel işletmelerde algılanan sosyal destek ile yaşam doyumu ve işgören performansı ilişkisi [The relationship between perceived social support and life satisfaction and employee performance in private enterprises]. International Journal of Academic Accumulatioın, 4(1), 84-97.
  • Ünal, S., Karlıdağ, R., & Yoloğlu, S. (2001). Hekimlerde tükenmişlik ve iş doyumu düzeylerinin yaşam doyumu düzeyleri ile ilişkisi [The relationship between burnout and job satisfaction levels and life satisfaction levels in physicians]. The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, 4(2), 113-118.
  • Umberson, D., Pudrovska, T., & Reczek, C. (2010). Parenthood, childlessness, and well-being: A life course perspective. Journal of Marriage and Family, 72(3), 612-629.
  • Yaremtchuk, S. V. (2014). Age, gender and life satisfaction in early adulthood in the far east of Russia. Life Science Journal, 11(11), 161-165.
  • Yıldırım, A., & Şimşek, H. (2018). Sosyal bilimlerde nitel araştırma yöntemleri [Qualitative research methods in the social sciences]. Seçkin Publishing.
Toplam 53 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil İngilizce
Konular Yetişkin Eğitimi
Bölüm Araştırma Makaleleri
Yazarlar

Bedriye Yılmaz Alıcı 0000-0002-2509-3376

Mehmet Kılıç 0000-0002-8675-5126

Gizem Sebahat Çoban 0000-0002-3000-6396

Proje Numarası yok
Erken Görünüm Tarihi 30 Mart 2024
Yayımlanma Tarihi 31 Mart 2024
Kabul Tarihi 15 Mart 2024
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2024 Cilt: 6 Sayı: 1

Kaynak Göster

APA Yılmaz Alıcı, B., Kılıç, M., & Çoban, G. S. (2024). Investigation of Life Satisfaction Levels in Adults in Terms of Some Variables: North Cyprus Example. Ahmet Keleşoğlu Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 6(1), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.38151/akef.2024.126
 Kapak Resmi İndir

28981289802580829733